24th May 1725. Crime and Corruption.

‘When constabulary duty to be done’: W.S. Gilbert, ‘Pirates of Penzance’

The distinction between criminals and thief catchers was rather blurred in the early 18thc  as we see with the self-styled ‘Thief-Taker-General’, Jonathan Wild hanged Today at Tyburn in 1725.

Ticket for Hanging of Jonathan Wild

Ticket for the hanging of Jonathan Wild.

The son of a wig-maker he was both criminal and ‘detective’ as after serving a sentence for debt, on his release he became a receiver of stolen goods to be returned to their owner for a reward. The thieves who worked with him also ‘got a cut’.

As a result Wild built up quite a business, with the backing of those at the top. Anyone who refused to work with him such as Jack Sheppard was handed over to the authorities. No honour among thieves!

Wild was employed as a thief-taker and  responsible, it was claimed, for bringing to the gallows 35 highwaymen, 22 burglars and 10 escaped convicts, at a time when there were about 180 capital offences.

To put things into context crime and corruption in 18thc Britain was endemic from the Lord Chancellor downwards; Wild’s escapades were ‘small beer’.(1)

The Saxons had introduced law and order to their communities, with ten tythings under a tything-man, ten of which comprised a larger group of the hundred under a hundred-man. He reported to the shire-reeve of the County.(2)

After the Norman Conquest we see the parish constable (from the Latin comes stabuli), ‘officer of the stables’. 

By the 13thc reign of Edward I we see a stricter determination to enforce law and order after complaints that local people were reluctant to do justice to strangers. Responsibility was now placed on each hundred and district to be responsible for unsolved crimes.(3)

Now each man was to keep weapons, with a duty to take part in ‘Hue and Cry’.

With the expansion of communities a ‘Town Watch’ was charged with guarding the gates and streets at night. Two constables were responsible for each hundred or ‘franchise’, a system running alongside the smaller parishes with its constable.

It was a rather an ineffective and corrupt system as we see with Jonathan Wild, but set to continue until the reforms of the 19thc.

The Author remembers the local Burton Borough Watch Committee, in the mid-20th century, by which time, among law enforcement, they were responsible for censoring the cinema screenings for anything deemed undesirable.

Jonathan Wild was as customary dissected by the Royal College of Surgeons and his skeleton can be seen at the Hunterian Museum, Lincolns Inn Fields, London.

(1) The Lord Chancellor, the Earl of Macclesfield (1718-25) and Regent between Anne and George I, was impeached for taking £100,000 in bribes (£11m today). Robert Walpole, so-called first Prime-Minister was corrupt, and it was the time of the South-Sea Bubble.

(2) Tything was related to Frankpledge and known as Head Borough in Kent.

(3) In Statute 13 Edward I in the 1285 Statute of Winchester ( where his parliament was held in the autumn.),

Ref: wikipedia.org/1st_earl_macclesfield.

Ref: wikipedia.org/jonathan_wild/Pic Image.

 

Advertisements

Tags: , , , , ,

About colindunkerley

My name is Colin Dunkerley who having spent two years in the Royal Army Pay Corps ploughed many a barren industrial furrow until drawn to the 'chalk-face' as a teacher, now retired. I have spent the last 15 years researching all aspects of life in Britain since Roman times.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: